Deprecated: The behavior of unparenthesized expressions containing both '.' and '+'/'-' will change in PHP 8: '+'/'-' will take a higher precedence in /home/channelc/discuss.channelcanada.com/includes/class_core.php on line 5842

PHP Warning: Use of undefined constant MYSQL_NUM - assumed 'MYSQL_NUM' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in ..../includes/init.php on line 165

PHP Warning: Use of undefined constant MYSQL_ASSOC - assumed 'MYSQL_ASSOC' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in ..../includes/init.php on line 165

PHP Warning: Use of undefined constant MYSQL_BOTH - assumed 'MYSQL_BOTH' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in ..../includes/init.php on line 165

PHP Warning: "continue" targeting switch is equivalent to "break". Did you mean to use "continue 2"? in ..../includes/functions_navigation.php on line 588

PHP Warning: "continue" targeting switch is equivalent to "break". Did you mean to use "continue 2"? in ..../includes/functions_navigation.php on line 612

PHP Warning: Use of undefined constant userid - assumed 'userid' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in ..../includes/class_bootstrap.php(433) : eval()'d code on line 46

PHP Warning: Use of undefined constant HTML_CHECKED - assumed 'HTML_CHECKED' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in ..../includes/class_bootstrap.php(433) : eval()'d code on line 55

PHP Warning: Use of undefined constant onlinestatusphrase - assumed 'onlinestatusphrase' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in ..../includes/class_core.php(4684) : eval()'d code on line 6

PHP Warning: Use of undefined constant onlinestatusphrase - assumed 'onlinestatusphrase' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in ..../includes/class_core.php(4684) : eval()'d code on line 6

PHP Warning: Use of undefined constant onlinestatusphrase - assumed 'onlinestatusphrase' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in ..../includes/class_core.php(4684) : eval()'d code on line 6

PHP Warning: Use of undefined constant onlinestatusphrase - assumed 'onlinestatusphrase' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in ..../includes/class_core.php(4684) : eval()'d code on line 6

PHP Warning: Use of undefined constant onlinestatusphrase - assumed 'onlinestatusphrase' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in ..../includes/class_core.php(4684) : eval()'d code on line 6

PHP Warning: Use of undefined constant onlinestatusphrase - assumed 'onlinestatusphrase' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in ..../includes/class_core.php(4684) : eval()'d code on line 6

PHP Warning: Use of undefined constant onlinestatusphrase - assumed 'onlinestatusphrase' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in ..../includes/class_core.php(4684) : eval()'d code on line 6

PHP Warning: Use of undefined constant onlinestatusphrase - assumed 'onlinestatusphrase' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in ..../includes/class_core.php(4684) : eval()'d code on line 6

PHP Warning: Use of undefined constant onlinestatusphrase - assumed 'onlinestatusphrase' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in ..../includes/class_core.php(4684) : eval()'d code on line 6

PHP Warning: Use of undefined constant onlinestatusphrase - assumed 'onlinestatusphrase' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in ..../includes/class_core.php(4684) : eval()'d code on line 6

PHP Warning: Use of undefined constant onlinestatusphrase - assumed 'onlinestatusphrase' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in ..../includes/class_core.php(4684) : eval()'d code on line 6

PHP Warning: Use of undefined constant onlinestatusphrase - assumed 'onlinestatusphrase' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in ..../includes/class_core.php(4684) : eval()'d code on line 6

PHP Warning: Use of undefined constant onlinestatusphrase - assumed 'onlinestatusphrase' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in ..../includes/class_core.php(4684) : eval()'d code on line 6

PHP Warning: Use of undefined constant onlinestatusphrase - assumed 'onlinestatusphrase' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in ..../includes/class_core.php(4684) : eval()'d code on line 6

PHP Warning: Use of undefined constant onlinestatusphrase - assumed 'onlinestatusphrase' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in ..../includes/class_core.php(4684) : eval()'d code on line 6

PHP Warning: Use of undefined constant onlinestatusphrase - assumed 'onlinestatusphrase' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in ..../includes/class_core.php(4684) : eval()'d code on line 57

PHP Warning: Use of undefined constant avatarurl - assumed 'avatarurl' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in ..../includes/class_core.php(4684) : eval()'d code on line 58

PHP Warning: Use of undefined constant onlinestatusphrase - assumed 'onlinestatusphrase' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in ..../includes/class_core.php(4684) : eval()'d code on line 6

PHP Warning: Use of undefined constant onlinestatusphrase - assumed 'onlinestatusphrase' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in ..../includes/class_core.php(4684) : eval()'d code on line 6

PHP Warning: Use of undefined constant onlinestatusphrase - assumed 'onlinestatusphrase' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in ..../includes/class_core.php(4684) : eval()'d code on line 6

PHP Warning: Use of undefined constant onlinestatusphrase - assumed 'onlinestatusphrase' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in ..../includes/class_core.php(4684) : eval()'d code on line 6

PHP Warning: Use of undefined constant onlinestatusphrase - assumed 'onlinestatusphrase' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in ..../includes/class_core.php(4684) : eval()'d code on line 6
Too much porn on TMN!!!!!!!!!!! - Page 2
Follow us on...
Follow us on Twitter Follow us on Facebook
Register
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 50
  1. #21
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    1,419
    I don't see a problem with porn on TMN or any permium station. Like someone mentioned they are movies and they have been on this channel since it's beginning under the name First Choice. Its on only one of their 7 channels a couple of hours per day. Why should they stop now? I am sure some of it's subscriber are keeping it only because of them and if it gives them more subscriber, it means more revenu which is good for them and ultimatly for me who wnats them to buy as much great movies and series as possible.

    Why is this even an issue after what 30 years of this going on...If you don't want to watch it don't. It is a premium channel and only people who want are subscribers. Even if they had a full channelof porn it would't be an issue as it is not forced to subscribers with any other services. It is not a seperate service, but an part of what TMN (and all it's previous names) has been all about.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    871
    ^
    True but the reverse problem exists. I can't get TMN or the adult channels without being forced to pay and get on my TV all the G rated nonsense and religious programming.

    100 Huntly Street daily on Global
    World Vison "We'll give you food if you take this bible" daily on Global
    CTS
    Salt and Light Television
    EWTN
    Grace TV

    Atleast Znaimer will be taking Vision out soon with a rebranding.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    116
    I agree that the system needs to be changed and that you should have a choice of what you watch and subscribe to. I myself don't watch the religious channels either and it is a waste of time for me to even have them on my service but i'm forced to have it by Rogers. Same with TMN the porn comes with it and thats a problem for others who only want movies . Customers should be given more choice for the money they are paying but some stuff is forced on all of us whether we like it or not. I don't have a problem with porn or religion but it should'nt be forced on subscribers either way. There needs to be changes made by the CRTC !

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    523
    Quote Originally Posted by NakedGord View Post
    Oh and regarding finding porn offensive...that's kind of funny since I find religion on TV offense. When will that be pulled from TV?

    When will movies and TV get religion warning labels like sex and violence?

    People can say what they want about porn but at least porn supporters don't fly planes into buildings or murder abortion doctors.
    +1

    Religion has been responsible for more death and violence than a pair of boobies.

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Montreal
    Posts
    4,857
    Quote Originally Posted by steelnikel View Post
    I myself don't watch the religious channels either and it is a waste of time for me to even have them on my service but i'm forced to have it by Rogers. (...) There needs to be changes made by the CRTC
    That's a "Rogers" issue for you. Other canadian providers provide religious channels in special packages, so if you want them, ask for them.
    Redirect your complains to Rogers. The CRTC has nothing to do with it.

    Quote Originally Posted by steelnikel View Post
    Same with TMN the porn comes with it and thats a problem for others who only want movies. Customers should be given more choice for the money they are paying but some stuff is forced on all of us whether we like it or not.
    Don't you think you contradict yourself here?

    NOBODY FORCES YOU TO SUBSCRIBE TO TMN !

    TMN is offering adult movies to give more choices to their paying subscribers !!!
    Think about it. For 14$ per month, they provide hollywood + canadian + foreign/independant movies + sillicon valley movies after midnight.
    On the other hand, you can pay 20$ per month for a 24/7 adult movies that you'll only watch after midnight anyways, but not every day...

    You find porn offensive? Well too bad, you asked for TMN, you asked for offensive content.
    You already saw the movies in theater or DVD or PPV that will premiere soon on TMN? Just too bad! TMN is NOT gonna program their schedule around YOU.

    Amen.
    We had a good run: 2006 to 2020. Thanks for the informations and debates.

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    1,419
    Packaging is all the providers decision. TMN can be taken here with only the basic digital channel, nothing else added to it for I thing 13$ a month. No need to buy anything else (with Videotron).

    So like it was mentioned, it is all about how the providers decide to package it.

  7. #27
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Greater Toronto Area
    Posts
    2,403
    Quote Originally Posted by InMontreal View Post
    That's a "Rogers" issue for you. Other canadian providers provide religious channels in special packages, so if you want them, ask for them.
    Redirect your complains to Rogers. The CRTC has nothing to do with it.
    In Rogers defence, it is a CRTC issue with a channel like CTS. It's a OTA station so it has the same mandatory carriage rights like CTV, Global and Citytv....sadly
    "And Now for Something Completely Different..." - John Cleese (Monty Python).

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    871
    @InMontreal


    Are you sure they're not lurking in the digital basic tier? On Cogeco that's where most of them are hiding.

    To everyone generally: Is there a list or way to find out how much these channels receive for carriage?

    If it could be proven to people they're paying for BDU optional channels that they don't want or perhaps even oppose perhaps there's a way to get the word out to get people to complain to have them dropped.

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    871
    Quote Originally Posted by Mayhem View Post
    In Rogers defence, it is a CRTC issue with a channel like CTS. It's a OTA station so it has the same mandatory carriage rights like CTV, Global and Citytv....sadly
    I wonder if they'll have the balls to request FFC in mandatory markets when it comes through.

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Montreal
    Posts
    4,857
    Quote Originally Posted by Mayhem View Post
    In Rogers defence, it is a CRTC issue with a channel like CTS. It's a OTA station so it has the same mandatory carriage rights like CTV, Global and Citytv....sadly
    Yeah, ok, fair enough, CITS-TV is there because it's an OTA station. CKXT-TV (SunTV) is also an OTA station. Nobody forces you to watch them, and you're not paying for them.
    As for the others religious channels (VisionTV, EWTN, GraceTV, Salt+Light), they have a specialty status and should be on accessible on subscription.

    Quote Originally Posted by NakedGord View Post
    Are you sure they're not lurking in the digital basic tier? On Cogeco that's where most of them are hiding.
    I just checked Cogeco Ontario and it's horrible, it's not the case for Cogeco Quebec. It's a Cogeco issue, not a CRTC one.

    Blame the CRTC for being forced to pay for services: APTN, Community Channel, CPAC, CBC News, RDI, Weather Network, and your provincial Parliament channel.
    Blame the CRTC for being forced to watch CTV, Global and Citytv in simulcast over the US networks.

    Quote Originally Posted by NakedGord View Post
    To everyone generally: Is there a list or way to find out how much these channels receive for carriage?
    Nope, the negociated price between the broadcaster and the BDU is secret in order to avoid other providers complaining about the price they do pay. O nthe other hand, the CRTC released an annual report for each specialties with numbers, but it's an overall revenues and depenses. I don't remember the thread but the link was provided on this forum back in April.
    We had a good run: 2006 to 2020. Thanks for the informations and debates.

  11. #31
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Burnaby, B.C.
    Posts
    87
    Quote Originally Posted by InMontreal View Post
    Yeah, ok, fair enough, CITS-TV is there because it's an OTA station. CKXT-TV (SunTV) is also an OTA station. Nobody forces you to watch them, and you're not paying for them.
    As for the others religious channels (VisionTV, EWTN, GraceTV, Salt+Light), they have a specialty status and should be on accessible on subscription.


    I just checked Cogeco Ontario and it's horrible, it's not the case for Cogeco Quebec. It's a Cogeco issue, not a CRTC one.

    Blame the CRTC for being forced to pay for services: APTN, Community Channel, CPAC, CBC News, RDI, Weather Network, and your provincial Parliament channel.
    Blame the CRTC for being forced to watch CTV, Global and Citytv in simulcast over the US networks.


    Nope, the negociated price between the broadcaster and the BDU is secret in order to avoid other providers complaining about the price they do pay. O nthe other hand, the CRTC released an annual report for each specialties with numbers, but it's an overall revenues and depenses. I don't remember the thread but the link was provided on this forum back in April.

    The rates are based on number of subscribers. The rate cards show what you will pay by subscriber base, but you have to sign a non-disclosure agreement to receive the rate card. The CRTC's rules require cstomers to be treated equally, at least for a SMATV customer as I am.
    Last edited by Strongman; 08-24-2010 at 08:42 PM. Reason: added info.

  12. #32
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    116
    [quote=InMontreal;35588]That's a "Rogers" issue for you. Other canadian providers provide religious channels in special packages, so if you want them, ask for them.
    Redirect your complains to Rogers. The CRTC has nothing to do with it.

    ve attit
    Don't you think you contradict yourself here?

    NOBODY FORCES YOU TO SUBSCRIBE TO TMN !

    I no longer subscribe to TMN or Superchannel and religious channels are in the basic service on Rogers and I have complained to them. TMN and Superchannel are'nt worth the money we are asked to pay for them. If they both combined their services then maybe the value would be there. I only have MPIX and for 4.00 mth thats great value with 2 channels plus MPIX HD and ondemand. The CRTC has a lot to do with offering real canadians content they want and not make them pay for garbage channels that they never watch. You seem a little upset every time I comment perhaps you should take things in your own hands and watch some porn. I don't need it, I get the real thing . Some people on the other hand have negative attitudes because they don't get enough !!!!!

  13. #33
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    12,204
    Quote Originally Posted by InMontreal View Post
    Don't you think you contradict yourself here?

    NOBODY FORCES YOU TO SUBSCRIBE TO TMN !

    You find porn offensive? Well too bad, you asked for TMN, you asked for offensive content.
    You already saw the movies in theater or DVD or PPV that will premiere soon on TMN? Just too bad! TMN is NOT gonna program their schedule around YOU.
    WOW! the only thing wrong with this post is that YOU complain about programming decisions ALL THE TIME.

    I hope you remember what you said to steelnikel before you make your next complaint about a network airing a program or type or programming you don't like.
    My views are my own and do not represent any company.

  14. #34
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    12,204
    Quote Originally Posted by NakedGord View Post
    Atleast Znaimer will be taking Vision out soon with a rebranding.
    What makes you think that religious programming will be removed from Vision TV? Znaimer has not stated anything about removing religious programming from Vision TV or JoyTV stations that they now own and control.
    My views are my own and do not represent any company.

  15. #35
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Calgary, AB
    Posts
    1,044
    Quote Originally Posted by steelnikel View Post
    I no longer subscribe to TMN or Superchannel and religious channels are in the basic service on Rogers and I have complained to them. TMN and Superchannel are'nt worth the money we are asked to pay for them.
    Actually the premiums are well worth the money they ask. Try taking a family of four out to the theatre to watch one movie. Even when we purchase coupons from Costco the cost for us to take ourselves and the kids out is around $45. Without the coupons you're looking closer to $70 with admission, munchies and drinks. The movie channels are a steal in comparison to that :)

    To maximize the value you have to stop renting DVDs though. The movies on the movie channels are usually around 6-12 months behind the DVD release. We only purchase the movies we really want to keep, otherwise we just wait for the movie service airings.

  16. #36
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Montreal
    Posts
    4,857
    Quote Originally Posted by TVViewer View Post
    WOW! the only thing wrong with this post is that YOU complain about programming decisions ALL THE TIME.

    I hope you remember what you said to steelnikel before you make your next complaint about a network airing a program or type or programming you don't like.
    Funny how you ignored my reply directed to you and you chose my reply to someone else in order to attack me again.

    I'm curious to know what type or programming I don't like you are reffering to.

    As previously requested: Put me back on ignore. Thanks.
    We had a good run: 2006 to 2020. Thanks for the informations and debates.

  17. #37
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    344
    Were people complaining with Citytv were showing these types of films on Friday Nights many years ago?

  18. #38
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    523
    Quote Originally Posted by IMissBCTV View Post
    Were people complaining with Citytv were showing these types of films on Friday Nights many years ago?
    I'm sure they were. They just didn't have the internet to complain on.

  19. #39
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    871
    @InMontreal. Thanks fo the info about the post. I'll start to dig through the site and see what I can find. Even if I can get the total payments by all BDU's to these channels that'll be a start.

  20. #40
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    871
    Quote Originally Posted by TVViewer View Post
    What makes you think that religious programming will be removed from Vision TV? Znaimer has not stated anything about removing religious programming from Vision TV or JoyTV stations that they now own and control.
    I'm sure Znaimer will keep programs that that'll make the most for the timeslot possible of course.

    However the big thing is these channels were devoted to religion before. Even if they aired secular programming the reasoning behind it was to serve their religion.

    Now Znaimer is rebuilding his media empire - that and profits for his backers at Goldman Sachs will be the driving force.

    Perhaps I'll get lucky and they'll start airing boomer aged Baby Blue Movies lol.

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •